|
| 1 | +Effects from shade are complicated, but can be summarized in two orthogonal categories: |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +1. shade across all modules parallel to strings |
| 4 | +2. shade across few modules perpendicular to strings |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +## shade parallel to rows |
| 7 | +Row-to-row shade in fixed-tilt systems, typically in winter, is an example of |
| 8 | +shade across all modules that is parallel to strings. When I originally wrote |
| 9 | +about [PV electrical mismatch]]({filename}PV-electrical-mismatch.md), I analyzed |
| 10 | +this type of shade using [PVMismatch](https://sunpower.github.io/PVMismatch/) |
| 11 | +to simulate shade across the bottom row of a single string of 10 modules in a |
| 12 | +10 string system. The conclusion of that post was that the string performed as |
| 13 | +well as the most shaded cell, so even though only the bottom cells were shaded, |
| 14 | +the modules in the string lost most of their power. I shaded the bottom cells |
| 15 | +80% to simulate only diffuse light, and the string lost roughly 80% of output. |
| 16 | +The other 9 strings operated at full capacity, so the system only lost 8%. The |
| 17 | +[NIST ground mount array](https://www.nist.gov/el/energy-and-environment-division-73200/heat-transfer-alternative-energy-systems/photovoltaic-1) |
| 18 | +is an example of a system that will have row-to-row shade in winter that will |
| 19 | +cause most of the strings to lose almost all of their output even when only |
| 20 | +the bottom row of cells is shaded. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +This topic is also covered in |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +## shade not parallel to rows |
| 27 | +However, that post also contained a picture of a rooftop with non-uniform shade |
| 28 | +that was not consistent across each module of the string. The shade cast from |
| 29 | +the roofline cut diagonally across the modules in the string, which was wrapped |
| 30 | +in two rows to fit. |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +I didn't analyze the shade from this system in that post, so it raises the |
| 35 | +question whether the rule of thumb I recommended would still apply? |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +## shade perpendicular to rows |
| 38 | +To simplify the question, the rest of this post analyzes a PV system with a |
| 39 | +shade obstacle like a wind turbine tower or a telephone pole that casts shade |
| 40 | +perpendicular to the rows. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +>TL;DR: When shade cuts perpendicular to strings, cells go into reverse bias, |
| 43 | +bypass diodes activate in the shaded submodules, and the other modules operate |
| 44 | +at higher voltage to match the voltage of unshaded parallel strings. |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 |
0 commit comments