-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Feedback on contribution process needed #19
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
lots of direction providedinstruction on how to address the issue is providedinstruction on how to address the issue is providedsmall effortbite sized tasks with minimal expertise neededbite sized tasks with minimal expertise needed
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
lots of direction providedinstruction on how to address the issue is providedinstruction on how to address the issue is providedsmall effortbite sized tasks with minimal expertise neededbite sized tasks with minimal expertise needed
To improve the contribution workflow and drive community involvement, we need feedback on the process we have established. Anyone is welcome to weigh in on this issue by commenting and describing your experience and/or how it could be improved; no need to assign yourself. For now, this issue is just a discussion. New sub-issues can be created to address necessary changes that get agreed upon through discussion.
You might have feedback on:
Are the issue descriptions clear? Do you know what you should do?
Is it difficult or easy to coordinate your work with other contributors (as needed)?
Are there issues you feel you can contribute to?
Are the issue templates useful?
Does CONTRIBUTING.md need revision?
Does the system for acknowledging contributors need revision?
Anything else related to contributing