@@ -2418,6 +2418,16 @@ \subsubsection{Stretching the PEG molecule}
24182418 include element names in the dump file and simplify visualization.}
24192419\end {note }
24202420
2421+ \begin {note }
2422+ {\color {blue}
2423+ Microstates collected during a simulation in the form of a trajectory
2424+ can be analyzed within LAMMPS using the \lmpcmd {rerun} command. This is
2425+ particularly useful, for example, for computing properties not set up in
2426+ the original simulation without having to run it again. A possible use of
2427+ the \lmpcmd {rerun} command is estimating the self-diffusion coefficient
2428+ by using the \lmpcmd {compute msd} command~\cite {frenkel2023understanding }.}
2429+ \end {note }
2430+
24212431\subsection {Tutorial 4: Nanosheared electrolyte }
24222432\label {sheared-confined-label }
24232433
@@ -4228,9 +4238,9 @@ \subsubsection{Method 1: Free sampling}
42284238\paragraph {The limits of free sampling }
42294239
42304240Increasing the value of $ U_0 $ reduces the average number of atoms in the central
4231- region, making it difficult to achieve a high-resolution free energy profile.
4232- For example, running the same simulation with $ U_ 0 = 10 \epsilon $ ,
4233- corresponding to $ U_0 \approx 10 k_\text {B} T$ , results in no atoms exploring
4241+ region, making it difficult to achieve a high-resolution free energy profile
4242+ { \color {blue} within reasonable simulation times}. For example, running the same
4243+ simulation with $ U_ 0 = 10 \epsilon $ , corresponding to $ U_0 \approx 10 k_\text {B} T$ , results in no atoms exploring
42344244the central part of the simulation box during the simulation.
42354245In such a case, employing an enhanced sampling method is recommended, as done in the next section.
42364246
@@ -4699,21 +4709,16 @@ \subsubsection{Simulating the reaction}
46994709 react R2 all 1 0 3.0 mol3 mol4 M-P.rxnmap &
47004710 react R3 all 1 0 5.0 mol5 mol6 P-P.rxnmap
47014711\end {lstlisting }
4702- % CA: can someone confirm my changes added in this paragraph? I am unsure of them
4703- % as I literally just figured it out to write them. (PS: I just realized that some
4704- % of it may be redundant with the note, but I would still leave it as the reader
4705- % will have the full information.
47064712With the \lmpcmd {stabilization} keyword, the \lmpcmd {fix bond/react} command will
47074713stabilize the atoms involved in the reaction using the \lmpcmd {fix nve/limit}
47084714command with a maximum displacement of $ 0.03 \, \mathrm {\AA {}}$ .
47094715{\color {blue}The \lmpcmd {fix nve/limit} command functions similar to
47104716\lmpcmd {fix nve}, but restricts how far atoms can move in a single time step, even with
47114717very large forces.}
47124718By default, each reaction is stabilized for 60 time steps. Each \lmpcmd {react} keyword
4713- corresponds to a reaction, e.g.,~a transformation of \lmpcmd {mol1} into \lmpcmd {mol2}
4714- based on the atom map \lmpcmd {M-M.rxnmap}. Implementation details about each reaction,
4715- such as the reaction distance cutoffs and the frequency with which to search for
4716- reaction sites, are also specified in this command.
4719+ corresponds to a reaction, e.g.,~a transformation of \lmpcmd {mol1} into \lmpcmd {mol2}.
4720+ Implementation details about each reaction, such as the reaction distance cutoffs
4721+ and the frequency with which to search for reaction sites, are also specified in this command.
47174722
47184723\begin {figure }
47194724\centering
0 commit comments