You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Drop ISSUE/cycle workflow refs and stale line numbers from comments
Six in-source workflow citations across the client / dbapi / SA-base
("ISSUE-39", "ISSUE-159", "ISSUE-198", "ISSUE-631", "ISSUE-696",
"cycle-18") leaked from review notes into shipped source. The
surrounding prose already explains the rationale; the bare token is
a footnote-to-the-tracker that goes stale silently when issues are
renumbered or moved.
Also fix two stale line-number citations: protocol.py's heartbeat-cap
comment cited line 82 / line 106 which now hold an unrelated helper's
docstring and a parameter declaration; replace with function-name
references that survive line drift. Update _check_in_use docstring to
list all four guards (the cycle 20 fork-pid check was added but the
docstring still listed three).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
0 commit comments