Thoughts on a more frequent release cycle? #3634
-
|
Hi Ivan (YaLTeR) and the Niri team, First of all, I want to say that the work you are doing here is great. Using Niri has been a blast! Thank you so much for building this and for all the effort you put into it. It’s really impressive stuff. I’m writing to ask if you would consider moving toward a more frequent release schedule featuring smaller, incremental improvements. While the major releases are always exciting, having more regular "point releases" or smaller updates would be a great way to get new features and bug fixes into the hands of users faster. Even if they are just small quality-of-life improvements. Thanks again for all the hard work! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 5 replies
-
|
While I agree with the sentiment, using the wip branch is pretty much what is being asked here. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I release when I feel the version is ready and has enough features. The current release is significantly delayed because:
That said, I'll hopefully finish it soon, and make a new release shortly thereafter. I am not doing any set release cycle because, again, hobby project, very little time to spare from uni work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I release when I feel the version is ready and has enough features. The current release is significantly delayed because:
That said, I'll hopefully finish it soon, and make a new release shortly thereafter.
I am not doing any set release cycle because, again, hobby project, very little time to spare from uni work.