Benchmark: TurboByte+TurboBitByte vs streamvbtyte

[powturbo]

TurboBitByte (=TurboByte+TurboPack) compress considerably better and can be more than 3 times faster than streamvbyte.

icapp ZIPF -I15 -J15 -v0 -e45,50,55,130
zipf alpha=1.50 range[0..255].n=1000000

E MB/s     size    ratio   D MB/s function integer size=32 bits
27832     998869  24.97%   61563    50:v8nenc128v32     TurboBitByte
50693    1003267  25.08%   86389    55:v8nenc256v32     TurboBitByte
22740    1250000  31.25%   33114    45:v8enc32          TurboByte SIMD           
20622    1250000  31.25%   33616   130:streamvbyte      StreamVByte SIMD         

icapp ZIPF -I15 -J15 -v0 -e45,50,55,130 -M100m
zipf alpha=1.50 range[0..104857600].n=1000000
17707    1301157  32.53%   33095    45:v8enc32          TurboByte SIMD
13432    1301157  32.53%   33065   130:streamvbyte      StreamVByte SIMD            
13164    1305035  32.63%   30378    55:v8nenc256v32     TurboBitByte
11348    1305997  32.65%   27898    50:v8nenc128v32     TurboBitByte

icapp lz77offset.u32.u32 -I16 -J15 -v0 -e45,55,130
12085   23992643  51.42%   12928    55:v8nenc256v32     TurboBitByte
11617   24287565  52.05%   13023    45:v8enc32          TurboBitByte
10607   24287565  52.05%   12857   130:streamvbyte      StreamVByte SIMD        

icapp lz77length.txt -Fc -I16 -J15 -v0 -e45,50,55,130
19006   29011087  17.52%   13987    50:v8nenc128v32     TurboBitByte          
17199   30265912  18.28%   13372    55:v8nenc256v32     TurboBitByte         
12624   51783739  31.27%   13419    45:v8enc32          TurboByte SIMD              
11206   51783739  31.27%   13563   130:streamvbyte      StreamVByte SIMD         

icapp lz77length.txt -Fc -I16 -J15 -e49,51,56,132
10733   33467195  20.21%   11283    51:v8nzenc128v32    TurboBitByte zigzag       
12947   34771338  21.00%   11736    56:v8nzenc256v32    TurboBitByte zigzag        
12232   51893881  31.34%   12566    49:v8zenc32         TurboByte zigzag       
 3988   51893881  31.34%    4694   132:streamvbyte zzag StreamVByte zigzag