File tree Expand file tree Collapse file tree 5 files changed +64
-1
lines changed
Expand file tree Collapse file tree 5 files changed +64
-1
lines changed Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ impl Dialect for GenericDialect {
5252 true
5353 }
5454
55+ fn supports_left_associative_joins_without_parens ( & self ) -> bool {
56+ true
57+ }
58+
5559 fn supports_connect_by ( & self ) -> bool {
5660 true
5761 }
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -278,6 +278,34 @@ pub trait Dialect: Debug + Any {
278278 false
279279 }
280280
281+ /// Indicates whether the dialect supports left-associative join parsing
282+ /// by default when parentheses are omitted in nested joins.
283+ ///
284+ /// Most dialects (like MySQL or Postgres) assume **left-associative** precedence,
285+ /// so a query like:
286+ ///
287+ /// ```sql
288+ /// SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL JOIN t5 INNER JOIN t0 ON ...
289+ /// ```
290+ /// is interpreted as:
291+ /// ```sql
292+ /// ((t1 NATURAL JOIN t5) INNER JOIN t0 ON ...)
293+ /// ```
294+ /// and internally represented as a **flat list** of joins.
295+ ///
296+ /// In contrast, some dialects (e.g. **Snowflake**) assume **right-associative**
297+ /// precedence and interpret the same query as:
298+ /// ```sql
299+ /// (t1 NATURAL JOIN (t5 INNER JOIN t0 ON ...))
300+ /// ```
301+ /// which results in a **nested join** structure in the AST.
302+ ///
303+ /// If this method returns `false`, the parser must build nested join trees
304+ /// even in the absence of parentheses to reflect the correct associativity
305+ fn supports_left_associative_joins_without_parens ( & self ) -> bool {
306+ true
307+ }
308+
281309 /// Returns true if the dialect supports the `(+)` syntax for OUTER JOIN.
282310 fn supports_outer_join_operator ( & self ) -> bool {
283311 false
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -283,6 +283,10 @@ impl Dialect for SnowflakeDialect {
283283 true
284284 }
285285
286+ fn supports_left_associative_joins_without_parens ( & self ) -> bool {
287+ false
288+ }
289+
286290 fn is_reserved_for_identifier ( & self , kw : Keyword ) -> bool {
287291 // Unreserve some keywords that Snowflake accepts as identifiers
288292 // See: https://docs.snowflake.com/en/sql-reference/reserved-keywords
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -12526,7 +12526,11 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
1252612526 };
1252712527 let mut relation = self.parse_table_factor()?;
1252812528
12529- if self.peek_parens_less_nested_join() {
12529+ if !self
12530+ .dialect
12531+ .supports_left_associative_joins_without_parens()
12532+ && self.peek_parens_less_nested_join()
12533+ {
1253012534 let joins = self.parse_joins()?;
1253112535 relation = TableFactor::NestedJoin {
1253212536 table_with_joins: Box::new(TableWithJoins { relation, joins }),
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change @@ -15385,6 +15385,29 @@ fn check_enforced() {
1538515385 );
1538615386}
1538715387
15388+ #[test]
15389+ fn join_precedence() {
15390+ all_dialects_except(|d| !d.supports_left_associative_joins_without_parens())
15391+ .verified_query_with_canonical(
15392+ "SELECT *
15393+ FROM t1
15394+ NATURAL JOIN t5
15395+ INNER JOIN t0 ON (t0.v1 + t5.v0) > 0
15396+ WHERE t0.v1 = t1.v0",
15397+ // canonical string without parentheses
15398+ "SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL JOIN t5 INNER JOIN t0 ON (t0.v1 + t5.v0) > 0 WHERE t0.v1 = t1.v0",
15399+ );
15400+ all_dialects_except(|d| d.supports_left_associative_joins_without_parens()).verified_query_with_canonical(
15401+ "SELECT *
15402+ FROM t1
15403+ NATURAL JOIN t5
15404+ INNER JOIN t0 ON (t0.v1 + t5.v0) > 0
15405+ WHERE t0.v1 = t1.v0",
15406+ // canonical string with parentheses
15407+ "SELECT * FROM t1 NATURAL JOIN (t5 INNER JOIN t0 ON (t0.v1 + t5.v0) > 0) WHERE t0.v1 = t1.v0",
15408+ );
15409+ }
15410+
1538815411#[test]
1538915412fn parse_create_procedure_with_language() {
1539015413 let sql = r#"CREATE PROCEDURE test_proc LANGUAGE sql AS BEGIN SELECT 1; END"#;
You can’t perform that action at this time.
0 commit comments