Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I have never used nanobind with async code. The only relevant discussion is this one: #760 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I wrote a communication primitive in async coroutine style. And we'd like to explore the possibility to bridge this coroutine style to python land. In torch.distributed the async style is return an object want expose wait() function. I wonder if there's more native way to do so in the binding layer.
Would appreciate some insights on this topic :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions