Skip to content

Commit b2b6355

Browse files
committed
ENH: Use explicit item enumeration rather than raw paragraph text
1 parent 7bfa9a1 commit b2b6355

1 file changed

Lines changed: 13 additions & 18 deletions

File tree

SoftwareGuide/Latex/DesignAndFunctionality/Registration.tex

Lines changed: 13 additions & 18 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -560,29 +560,23 @@ \subsection{Too many samples outside moving image buffer}
560560
\end{itemize}
561561

562562

563-
564563
\subsection{General heuristics for parameter fine-tunning}
565564

566-
567-
568-
569-
570565
https://public.kitware.com/pipermail/insight-users/2007-March/021435.html
571566

572567
Here is some advice on how to fine tune the parameters
573568
of the registration process.
574569

570+
\begin{enumerate}
571+
\item Set Maximum step length to 0.1 and do not change it until all other parameters are stable.
575572

576-
1) Set Maximum step length to 0.1 and do not change it
577-
until all other parameters are stable.
578-
579-
2) Set Minimum step length to 0.001 and do not change it.
573+
\item Set Minimum step length to 0.001 and do not change it.
580574

581575
You could interpret these two parameters as if their
582576
units were radians. So, 0.1 radian = 5.7 degrees.
583577

584578

585-
3) Number of histogram bins:
579+
\item Number of histogram bins:
586580

587581
First plot the histogram of your image using the
588582
example program in
@@ -603,15 +597,15 @@ \subsection{General heuristics for parameter fine-tunning}
603597
us it for your Mutual Information metric.
604598

605599

606-
4) Number of Samples:
600+
\item Number of Samples:
607601
The trade-off with the number of samples is the following:
608602

609-
a) computation time of registration is linearly proportional
610-
to the number of samples
611-
b) the samples must be enough to significantly populate
612-
the joint histogram.
613-
c) Once the histogram is populated, there is not much
614-
use in adding more samples.
603+
\begin{enumerate}
604+
\item computation time of registration is linearly proportional to the number of samples
605+
\item the samples must be enough to significantly populate the joint histogram.
606+
\item Once the histogram is populated, there is not much use in adding more samples.
607+
\end{enumerate}
608+
615609
Therefore do the following:
616610

617611
Plot the joint histogram of both images, using the number
@@ -641,7 +635,7 @@ \subsection{General heuristics for parameter fine-tunning}
641635
size of a piece of steel that will support a bridge, and then
642636
you enlarge it to keep it away from the critical value.
643637

644-
5) The MOST critical values of the registration process are the
638+
\item The MOST critical values of the registration process are the
645639
scaling parameters that define the proportions between
646640
the parameters of the transform. In your case, for an Affine
647641
Transform in 2D, you have 6 parameters. The first four are
@@ -689,6 +683,7 @@ \subsection{General heuristics for parameter fine-tunning}
689683
and plot the translation coordinates so that you can get a feeling
690684
of how the registration is behaving.
691685

686+
\end{enumerate}
692687

693688
Note also that image registration is not a science. It is a pure
694689
engineerig practice, and therefore, there are no correct answers,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)