Skip to content

Update of main branch after release#157

Merged
victoriobentivogli merged 484 commits intomainfrom
develop
Sep 17, 2025
Merged

Update of main branch after release#157
victoriobentivogli merged 484 commits intomainfrom
develop

Conversation

@victoriobentivogli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Update of the main branch after release 1.1.0 has been published.

schivmeister and others added 30 commits April 10, 2025 22:22
- Split off from "other" in CN to the relevant document types
- PMC goes to PIN
- COMPL goes to CAN

Ignore the Git diff rename interpretations -- they are haywire.
Mistakenly retained erroneous name for 'PurposeLot'.
OPT-301-Part-AddInfo
OPT-301-Part-DocProvider
OPT-301-Part-ReviewOrg
OPT-301-Part-ReviewInfo
There is a subtle difference which we happened to observe: the referred
notice cannot be interpreted as a PlanningNotice until and unless it has
a planning-related property, which is announcesPlannedProcurementPart.
From that point on it becomes a PlanningNotice.

We split up the refersToPrevious along the lines of
PlanningNotice->Notice and PlanningNotice->PlanningNotice. The Notice
instance should therefore have both types, and that's the only change
this produces in the output.

This is mainly a reorganization of technical mapping for consistency
with the conceptual mapping.
Plus update output (removal of some refersTo roles, which probably
happened somewhere along the way).

Co-authored-by: schivmeister <rashif.rahman@meaningfy.ws>
- BT-200-Contract
- BT-201-Contract
- BT-1501(s)-Contract
- BT-202-Contract

Caveat: We do not yet have a link from the ContractAmendment to the
Contract to be modified, and we are creating the changed section
Identifier with the base URI of the current notice (it could very well
be that of the previous notice but it did not appear to make a practical
difference).

Co-authored-by: schivmeister <rashif.rahman@meaningfy.ws>
- For reason, expect ReasonCode or ReasonDescription
- For section identifier, expect ChangedSection/ChangedSectionIdentifier
BT-191-Tender
BT-160-Tender
BT-162-Tender
BT-163-Tender
Except:

OPT-301-Part-Mediator
OPT-301-Part-ReviewOrg
OPT-301-Part-ReviewInfo
- Update Makefile to support sync'ing and generating up to v1.13 [1]
- Update multiver prep script to support distribution up to v1.13
- Update multiver transformation script to fix pre-existing errors
- Extend multiver transformation script to support additional type `e5`
- Include relevant versioned examples and initialize their outputs

[1] These will create new packages not yet tracked, so either start
tracking them or be careful to exclude them before making commits.
Involving epo:ReviewDecision, epo:ReviewRequest:

BT-784-Review
BT-785-Review
BT-787-Review
BT-788-Review
BT-789-Review
BT-793-Review
BT-794-Review
BT-795-Review
BT-796-Review
BT-797-Review
BT-798-Review
schivmeister and others added 26 commits July 15, 2025 15:07
Fix SelectionTerm parameter mixup in SDK v1.3-1.8
While the conditional expressions for the SelectionCriterion weight and
threshold were fixed, the v1.3-1.7 mapping for the Constraint (where the
threshold value is asserted) was left without a guard. Adding this guard
prevents runt instances of the Constraint in notices such as 549867-2024
where there is no threshold.
Fix empty SelectionCriterion Constraint for SDK v1.3-1.7
Added test data for eforms subtypes: CEI and E1-E6
Add outputs for all new sample test files
Add/update reports, validations, mapping version
@victoriobentivogli victoriobentivogli self-assigned this Sep 17, 2025
@victoriobentivogli victoriobentivogli marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2025 14:01
@victoriobentivogli victoriobentivogli merged commit a7d75fe into main Sep 17, 2025
2 checks passed
victoriobentivogli added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2025
Merge pull request #157 from OP-TED/develop
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants