Skip to content

Relax assumptions#316

Open
raffaelemancuso wants to merge 1 commit intoStatProofBook:masterfrom
raffaelemancuso:patch-1
Open

Relax assumptions#316
raffaelemancuso wants to merge 1 commit intoStatProofBook:masterfrom
raffaelemancuso:patch-1

Conversation

@raffaelemancuso
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Uncorrelatedness is sufficient for a diagonal variance-covariance matrix, independence is not necessary

Uncorrelatedness is sufficient for a diagonal variance-covariance matrix, independence is not necessary
@JoramSoch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

JoramSoch commented Apr 13, 2026

Dear @raffaelemancuso, thanks for your PR!

First of all, you are right: Uncorrelatedness is a weaker requirement than independence, such that the Theorem could potentially hold for more cases. However, it is my impression that such theorems are often formulated for independent random variables. Here are a few examples:

One reason for this might be that independence is more often "known", because independence (but not uncorrelatedness) is assumed by some generative model. Relatedly, uncorrelated random variables are not necessarily independent although the inverse holds true which people often confuse.

I would therefore suggest not to rewrite this Theorem, but to add another Theorem with the relaxed assumptions. What do you think?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants