Skip to content

refactor: Bump @types/node from 25.5.2 to 25.6.0#229

Merged
mtrezza merged 1 commit intoparse-community:mainfrom
mtrezza:refactor/types-node-25.6.0
Apr 16, 2026
Merged

refactor: Bump @types/node from 25.5.2 to 25.6.0#229
mtrezza merged 1 commit intoparse-community:mainfrom
mtrezza:refactor/types-node-25.6.0

Conversation

@mtrezza
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mtrezza mtrezza commented Apr 16, 2026

Bump @types/node from 25.5.2 to 25.6.0 (devDependency, minor).

Closes #224

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated development dependencies to their latest versions.

@parse-github-assistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Thanks for opening this pull request! We appreciate your effort in improving the project. Please let us know once your pull request is ready for review.

Tip

  • Keep pull requests small. Large PRs will be rejected. Break complex features into smaller, incremental PRs.
  • Use Test Driven Development. Write failing tests before implementing functionality. Ensure tests pass.
  • Group code into logical blocks. Add a short comment before each block to explain its purpose.
  • We offer conceptual guidance. Coding is up to you. PRs must be merge-ready for human review.
  • Our review focuses on concept, not quality. PRs with code issues will be rejected. Use an AI agent.
  • Human review time is precious. Avoid review ping-pong. Inspect and test your AI-generated code.

Note

Please respond to review comments from AI agents just like you would to comments from a human reviewer. Let the reviewer resolve their own comments, unless they have reviewed and accepted your commit, or agreed with your explanation for why the feedback was incorrect.

Caution

Pull requests must be written using an AI agent with human supervision. Pull requests written entirely by a human will likely be rejected, because of lower code quality, higher review effort and the higher risk of introducing bugs. Please note that AI review comments on this pull request alone do not satisfy this requirement. Our CI and AI review are safeguards, not development tools. If many issues are flagged, rethink your development approach. Invest more effort in planning and design rather than using review cycles to fix low-quality code.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c734d8ec-4431-4fc0-a59f-ba541dfeefd9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c14a3a and ec81ab0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package-lock.json
  • package.json

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated the @types/node development dependency from version 25.5.2 to 25.6.0 in package manifest and lock files, along with the associated undici-types nested dependency from 7.18.2 to 7.19.2, including updated integrity hashes and resolved URLs.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency Version Bump
package.json, package-lock.json
Updated @types/node from 25.5.2 to 25.6.0 and bumped nested undici-types dependency from 7.18.2 to 7.19.2 with updated integrity hashes and resolved URLs.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description is incomplete and lacks required sections from the template, particularly the Approach section describing the changes in detail. Add Approach section describing the changes made, and include Issue and Tasks sections as specified in the template structure.
Engage In Review Feedback ❓ Inconclusive PR review comments and author engagement exist exclusively on GitHub's platform and are not accessible in the sandbox environment or git repository. Access PR #229 on GitHub directly to examine review comments and verify the author engaged with feedback appropriately.
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The PR title begins with 'refactor:' prefix as required and clearly describes the main change: bumping @types/node from 25.5.2 to 25.6.0.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The PR successfully addresses issue #224 by updating @types/node from 25.5.2 to 25.6.0 in both package.json and package-lock.json.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed All changes are strictly limited to updating @types/node and its transitive dependency undici-types, with no unrelated modifications present.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Security Check ✅ Passed @types/node and undici-types are TypeScript type definitions in devDependencies only, containing no executable code and cannot introduce runtime security vulnerabilities.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Checkov (3.2.519)
package.json

2026-04-16 11:17:22,032 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 11:17:22,031 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 11:17:22,035 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Template file not found: package.json
2026-04-16 11:17:22,154 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Failed to invoke function /usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner. with package.json
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 88, in func_wrapper
result = original_func(item)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/object_runner.py", line 74, in
results = parallel_runner.run_function(lambda f: (f, self._parse_file(f)), files_to_load)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/ope

... [truncated 2547 characters] ...

[MainThread ] [WARNI] Secret scanning: could not process file package.json
2026-04-16 11:17:22,283 [MainThread ] [ERROR] Exception traceback:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/main.py", line 647, in run
self.scan_reports = runner_registry.run(
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/runners/runner_registry.py", line 177, in run
for result in parallel_runner_results:
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.11/dist-packages/checkov/common/parallelizer/parallel_runner.py", line 118, in _run_function_multiprocess_fork
raise v.internal_exception.with_traceback(v.internal_exception.traceback)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'package.json'


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2c14a3a) to head (ec81ab0).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #229   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            4         4           
  Lines          159       159           
=========================================
  Hits           159       159           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mtrezza mtrezza merged commit a560ac9 into parse-community:main Apr 16, 2026
10 checks passed
@mtrezza mtrezza deleted the refactor/types-node-25.6.0 branch April 16, 2026 11:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant