Search results

error code used when the first frame is not QX_TRANSPORT_PARAMETERS

Status: Open.

#49 In quicwg/qmux;

· kazuho opened on Apr 6, 2026

Is receiving a QX_PING response with an unknown sequence number an error?

Status: Open.

#48 In quicwg/qmux;

· LPardue opened on Apr 4, 2026

handling of max_record_size TP in QUIC version 1

Status: Open.

#47 In quicwg/qmux;

· kazuho opened on Apr 4, 2026

Slight confusion what TPs are allowed or prohibited

Status: Open.

#46 In quicwg/qmux;

· LPardue opened on Apr 2, 2026

Reliable size

Status: Open.

#45 In quicwg/qmux;

· afrind opened on Mar 30, 2026

Require TCP

Status: Open.

#41 In quicwg/qmux;

· martinthomson opened on Mar 22, 2026

Say more about idle timeouts (and maybe GOAWAY?)

Status: Open.

#39 In quicwg/qmux;

· ianswett opened on Mar 21, 2026

Minimum frame size

Status: Open.

#37 In quicwg/qmux;

· kixelated opened on Mar 19, 2026

Effective frame size differences compared to QUIC - DATAGRAM but anything else?

Status: Open.

#34 In quicwg/qmux;

· LPardue opened on Mar 18, 2026

Do we need initial flow control transport parameters?

Status: Open.

#30 In quicwg/qmux;

· kixelated opened on Mar 13, 2026

Could QMUX optionally leverage the existing QUIC TLS negotiation?

Status: Open.

#17 In quicwg/qmux;

· guhetier opened on Nov 6, 2025

Clearly document downsides

editorial

Status: Open.

#6 In quicwg/qmux;

· LPardue opened on Feb 25, 2024